So, You Want to Draw Muhammad?

I love South Park; it’s one of the most brilliant shows of our time, providing excellent and necessary commentary on American society and politics in the form of well-written satire presented under the guise of the suspicious innocence of children.

Talking turds included.

So, one can only imagine what went through my head upon hearing about the newest controversy in a series I’d like to call, in the spirit of  the institutionalization of my knowledge via thesis proposal submission, “Pending Provocation: Depicting Holy Figures in the Cartoon Form and Subsequent Violence-Inducing Reactions by People of the Islamic Persuasion.”

South Park decides that for it’s 200th episode it was going to depict the Prophet Muhammad, in another installment of the League of Super Best Friends (a divine group, really). And some fringe extremist group Revolution Muslim, based in New York City, chats online about how Matt Stone and Trey Parker are gonna get Theo Van Gogh’d.

Slightly unsettling to say the least.

Comedy Central has a huge panic attack and censored the follow up episode, number 201, blocking any and all references to the Prophet in the cartoon, whose super power is the ability to not be criticized by anyone. Catch ends up being that the Prophet, disguised throughout the cartoon in a bear costume, is actually revealed to be Santa Claus.

Okay, cool.

But it doesn’t end there. What’s spawned from this little controversy has been a huge mess and mixture of ignorance, Islamophobia, intolerance and further and completely unnecessary provocation.


Aside from the inciting comments made by Revolution Muslim, there have been – at least to my own knowledge – no protests against the cartoons in the broader Muslim community. No threats. No real and inciting condemnations. Perhaps people, like me, expressing their discomfort in watching such an episode (See also: Aasif Maandvi on the Daily Show). But that’s about it.

But the backlash from those who claim to be the supreme bearers of free speech and all that is “Western” and beautiful? Holy crap.

The media coverage of this incident has been thunderous, equivalent to the Danish cartoon controversy which had far more of an actual violent backlash, which was indicative of political dissatisfaction and in response to some rather distastefully done and (some) poorly satirical cartoons, printed by a well-established right-wing, anti-immigrant newspaper.

Why is the same level of attention being given to this South Park  issue?

All of sudden a cartoon made by a Seattle cartoonist, Molly Norris, which asked for ‘the real likeness of Muhammad [to] please stand-up’ was used in a campaign proclaiming May 20th “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day!”. Facebook, along with comments sections everywhere, implode with endless “yeah! This’ll show them! First amendment!” chatter in response to …to …

…to a fringe group?

This is where I get offended. I’m not offended by South Park’s depiction of the Prophet. I’m uncomfortable with it, but I’m not necessarily offended. I’m not losing any sleep over it. I worked things out with young myself back during the good ol’ days of the Danish cartoon controversy, which, again, were far more resonant of a real antagonism towards the growing (and visible) Muslim minority in Denmark. But South Park? No. Not really. Not really a cause for concern. I remember watching the first episode which introduced the League of Super Best Friends – originally aired in 2001, prior to the murder of Theo Van Gogh – and seeing the Prophet depicted, in a positive light. I remember feeling incredibly uncomfortable but never offended.

What offends me is that a fringe group like Revolution Muslim is being listened to by my fellow citizens who are not Muslim. That my fellow citizens are falling into exactly what fringe groups hope to achieve, if even on some subconscious freudian level – wreak frenzy, divides and controversy. Their fulfillment is never in anything good, pure and pious (i.e. their own betterment as human beings). Their fulfillment is in driving the divide that has been created and is increasingly becoming deeper. And how do my non-Muslim fellow citizens and, presumably, South Park enthusiasts, react?

By …claiming May 20th as Everybody Draw Mohammad Day?

Are people for real anymore?

I support freedom of expression, but I have a problem when freedom of expression becomes almost synonymous with deliberate provocation.  And let’s not fool ourselves – this reaction to a fringe group’s online subpar-but-still-a-gruesome-reference-made threat to Stone and Parker is not in celebration of the freedom of expression and speech. Please. If you’re going to serve me the turds of bulls, I’d like them on a silver plated platter.

At the very least.

What this recent controversy shows us is not the overreaction of Muslims, but the overreaction of people who are starting to see a real problem in the general presence of Muslims. By people who think every little group speaks on behalf of all Muslims. By people who have their mind made up about a religion they’ve most likely only have ever read about online. By people just generally misinformed and terrified of an unuttered, non-existent threat.

What good is provoking the vast majority of Muslims, who could care less about the South Park man-made fiasco, going to do? When you tell me – a Muslim who is more interested in the recent Krygyz revolution and Goldman Sachs brouhaha than South Park depicting the Prophet of my faith in a non-offensive light – that you’re going to, in the spirit of freedom of expression, draw to your own liking a depiction of the Prophet Muhammad ..what exactly is being said here?

Are you actually showing me, telling me that freedom of expression is a beautiful and powerful thing which creates real momentum for progress if and when used rightfully? Or are you just showing me spite?

Let’s get over this. It’s stupid, it’s lame, and if you’re planning in attending Everybody Draw Mohammad Day! then good job on being bought into the hype.

And to my fellow Muslims, all I have to say is – remember the Sunnah. With all this emphasis on the Prophet, remember him as who is was not who we have made him seem. The Prophet, may peace and blessing be upon him, had the most foul of words and rocks thrown at him, he was endlessly ridiculed for his message and for what he brought – change – to pre-Islamic Arabian society. And how did he respond? With patience. He was a soft man, polite, respectful and never harsh. And remember that the Prophet has always been treated with malice – from his own lifetime to Dante’s famous depiction of him in his Divine Comedy.

Rather than react, as Muslims we should reflect. We should consider what we have turned our religion into which seems to almost justify, in the eyes of too many, the sort of reaction propelled by the South Park controversy.

Additionally, we all must reflect on how we continue for the growing visibility of Muslims in the West to allow for fear-drenched, racist and generally backwards words, policies and ideas to be thrown about and accepted. Muslims are certainly not alone in this and they certainly are not the most pained receivers of such a brunt, but they are the ones who easily are sensationalized. They make for better news.

And angrier, albeit horrifically laughable, comments’ sections.

And not equal are the good deed and the bad. Repel [evil] by that [deed] which is better; and thereupon the one whom between you and him is enmity [will become] as though he was a devoted friend. But none is granted it except those who are patient, and none is granted it except one having a great portion [of good].” Qur’an 41:34- 35

11 thoughts on “So, You Want to Draw Muhammad?

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention So, You Want to Draw Muhammad? « Aristotle's Lackey: Sana Saeed --

  2. Well put.

    If anyone wants to draw the Prophet Muhammad (salutations be upon him & his family) the descriptions available in the “seerah” or “sirah” should help you. They are extremely precise and include every minute detail.

    If you’re gonna do it…you might as well do it right.

  3. Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  4. To the “I’ll draw Muhammad If I damn well please” – I’m personally not religious and don’t care about people drawing Islamic figures. However, most of you assholes who pride yourselves in the mantra of Western liberal-style democracy, and freedom of expression in fact exhibit quite the opposite when it comes to respecting other groups. If I caricatured a Jew I would be labeled an anti-Semite. It would cause uproar and perhaps an international outcry. In fact, as a response to a few questionably anti-Semitic cartoons in some independent newspaper in Syria in the 1990s (they were not even caricatures- they were factual and funny. Yes, Sharon has ordered the killing of Palestinian children in numerous massacres, I don’t see how that is misrepresentative, blood libel, or anti-Semitic)Hillel invited a clown masquerading as a scholar from Belgium to discuss issues of anti-Semitism. Tell me that is not overreacting and being hypocritical. What I find abhorrent in the Muslim community is responding with violence and death threats- we have come to a time which Ahmadinejad calls a time for ideas, exchange. I strongly disagree with the violent reactions of some Muslims to cartoons/caricatures, but I also find despicable the farce that Muslims are the only overly sensitive ones when it comes to drawings.

  5. To Mezba:

    your post seems to be completely missing the point of the South Park episode. I don’t see what child infanticide, women’s rights, or Prophet Muhammad’s physical aestheticism has anything to do with the episode. South Park does not claim to be pedagogically instructive; it is first and foremost entertainment, and then arguably a social commentary. You have taken this episode to a useless dimension, which although let’s say the episode could have perhaps been provocative, you respond with something far less constructive. There are misrepresentations of sacrosanct figures all the time, I don’t see why this is so polemical.

    The main problem in this debate in my opinion is that on the one hand, staunch Muslims denounce being associated with ‘fringe’ groups and radical members, yet on the other you appropriate a similar discourse finding these portrayals offensive. Such interplay between association and disassociation is confusing and far from helpful. The cartoon is at its worst disrespectful. Those who find it offensive should not waste their time because there will always be people who enjoy provocation. Maybe the best thing to do is ignore it- it will give them less a reason to exploit Muslim sensitivity.

  6. also one last thing…….

    why are you guys watching south park if it’s so offensive? do jews and blacks sift through neo-nazi white supremacist blogs? if it’s so offensive, don’t watch it- we can’t live in a world where every bit of content respects the values and beliefs of ALL human beings.

  7. I don’t understand your argument. I hold South Park to be a piece of crap – that is my opinion. You are entitled to yours. I feel they shouldn’t portray Muhammad, that’s again a valid piece of opinion. What I have said is I don’t like violence to protest the portrayal of Muhammad, that offends me more that the actual imagery. You fail to understand that. And somehow while you give South Park the right to offend me, you don’t give me the right to be offended.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s